Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- sd:this_machine_does_not_exist [2026/02/24 13:44] – created - external edit 127.0.0.1
+++ sd:this_machine_does_not_exist [2026/03/10 05:33] (current) – appledog
@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 In those days, things were a lot simpler. There was little to no multithreading. Most things like IO were memory-mapped. The graphics was a framebuffer.
-Over time, games like Wolfenstein, DOOM and QUAKE caused people to gravitate towards computers with graphics acceleration. Windowing user interfaces began to push a callback-style of programming. Lazy developers started writing libraries than ran on the UI thread because it was easy. And just like that, an era was erased. The era where the computer only does what you tell it to.
+Over time, games like Wolfenstein, DOOM and QUAKE caused people to gravitate towards computers with graphics acceleration. Windowing user interfaces began to push a callback-style of programming. Lazy developers started writing libraries than ran on the UI thread because it was easy. And just like that, an era was erased. The era where the computer only does what you tell it to do.
-In the old days when you turned the computer on, it was on immediately. You could immediately load and run //anything//. There were no logins. Over time, things changed. Some for the better, some for the worse. But what if?
+When you turned the computer on, it was on immediately. You could immediately load and run //anything//. There were no logins. The computer made noises when it loaded a program from disk. Over time, things changed. Some for the better, some for the worse. But what if?
-What if there was "one more try" -- one more great home PC -- Not 8 bit, but 16bit -- maybe 32 -- but with the same classic hobbyist interface? Something that was much, much faster and more capable than a Commodore 64? But at the same time, eschewing many of the mistakes the IBM PC era ushered in?
+What if you had one more chance? "One more try" -- one more great home PC -- Not 8 bit, but 16bit -- yet with the same classic hobbyist interface? Something that was much, much faster and more capable than a TRS-80, an Apple II, a BBC Micro, a Commodore 64? What if it was more modern, but at the same time, didn't make the same mistakes the industry made in the 90s?
 It's a dream -- but sometimes, dreams can become the highest reality.
-I give you the the SD-8516. Comparable to a Sega Dreamcast or Nintendo 64 in terms of raw cpu power, sound, and graphics performance. But no tricks. Just a plain, flat system. Roaring with energon. Waiting for you to explore. Waiting for you to go on just one more //great adventure.//
+**I give you the the SD-8516.**
+Comparable to the Dreamcast or N64 in terms of raw CPU power, sound, and graphics performance. But no tricks. Just a plain, flat system. Roaring with energon. Waiting for you to explore. Waiting for you to go on just one more //great adventure.//
 The SD-8516. What if?
+-----
+//based on "This machine does not exist." from the DatCube82 website//