Yes, you can write C code for the SD-8516. However there are certain… limitations of the self-hosted project. Staying positive however, you can do quite a bit.
| TinyC V1 can do.. | Not available |
|---|---|
| Builtins (putchar, getchar, halt, yield) | no enums |
| int and char* (8-bit access) | no inits i.e. no int a = 5; |
| Expressions with precedence | no typedef, no casting, no conversions |
| Local variables | no multiple return types (int only) |
| if/else/else if | no static, extern, register, volatile, const |
| Comparison operators | no && or ||, no %, no bitwise ops |
| while | int *p; p + 1 adds 1 byte, not 3 |
| break/continue | no sizeof |
| Multiple functions + function calls | no function pointers |
| Function arguments | no varargs |
| Pointers (read, write, address-of) | no void type |
| Array indexing | no int a[10]; pointers only |
| String literals | no type checking |
| Hex literals | char arithmetic doesn't promote to int |
| Character literals | no standard library |
| Comments () | no dynamic memory |
| Global variables | no file IO and no access to system INT libraries |
What this is really is more of a baseline C you could write a better compiler in. That's where we are right now. Secondly, this is not packaged anywhere yet; I don't know if I want to release it because it is really not a very robust program; however, I very likely will, sometime in the fall.
v2 is v1 written in C. It compiles but there are issues. The issues revolve around the fact that this type of computer system is not really intended to host and run a C compiler. It can be done but as I have learned, the easy way forward is to rewrite the memory map and the kernal. This creates a chicken and egg problem. I need to rewrite the kernal, but I don't feel the need to rewrite the kernal in C just to rewrite the C compiler.
The LLVM back-end is not self hosted, obviously. However, I am learning a lot about C by doing this and I may be able to use what I know to help write v4 under the v2 compiler. Or at least, write v4 in v3 then try to back-work v1/v2 to compile that. Either way, this is the path forward.
Given all this I recommend you program in assembly first. That's really what this project is about, the retro way. You should give it a shot, if you've never tried assembly before. This platform is designed with hand-assembly in mind. Like the old days.
However, if you really want to program in C, well, talk to me, and maybe we can work something out where I try to package this for you to test it out.